• Users Online: 602
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 60-67

Managing cancer patients: The heart really matters


Department of Cardiology, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication31-Mar-2017

Correspondence Address:
Madhu Mary Minz
Department of Cardiology, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCPC.JCPC_8_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Early diagnosis of cancer and advances in the methods of cancer treatment over the past 25–30 years has led to increased number of cancer survivors. However, the conventional cancer treatments, radiotherapy, and the newer targeted therapy while successful at treating cancers are known to cause ill effects on the heart. Cardiotoxicity can develop during cancer treatment or can occur within days or months or even years after cessation of cancer treatment. The side effects of cancer treatment on the heart can be transient or can sometimes cause permanent damage to the heart, requiring life-long cardiac medications. The cardiovascular complications include myocardial dysfunction and heart failure, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, arterial hypertension, arrhythmia, QT prolongation, peripheral vascular disease, thromboembolic disease, and pericardial diseases. Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity can sometimes affect the ongoing cancer treatment, reduce quality of life, and increase the risk of death from cardiac-related causes. Early diagnosis of cardiac side effects using biomarkers such and imaging followed by initiation of cardioprotective drug is of utmost importance, so that the cancer patient can get overall benefit of life-saving cancer therapy. A long-term follow-up to identify late cardiac complications is also encouraged.

Keywords: Cancer chemotherapy, cardiotoxicity, targeted therapy


How to cite this article:
Kasliwal R R, Minz MM. Managing cancer patients: The heart really matters. J Clin Prev Cardiol 2017;6:60-7

How to cite this URL:
Kasliwal R R, Minz MM. Managing cancer patients: The heart really matters. J Clin Prev Cardiol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 15];6:60-7. Available from: https://www.jcpconline.org/text.asp?2017/6/2/60/203536




  Introduction Top


Cancer is among the leading causes of death worldwide, and according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer – GLOBOCAN – approximately 14 million new cases and 8.2 million cancer-related deaths occurred in 2012.[1] As per Indian Council of Medical Research, the estimated number of cancer patients in India is around 2.5 million with over 7 lakhs new patients getting registered every year. Cancer-related deaths amount to 556,400 annually.[2]

The numbers of cancer survivors continue to increase because of both advances in early detection and newer chemotherapy agents. However, mortality and morbidity among cancer survivors has increased due to side effect of cancer treatment. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most common reasons for premature mortality in cancer survivors. Heart disease following cancer treatment may be the result of direct cardiovascular damage caused by treatment itself or because of accelerated atherosclerotic process due to cancer treatment, especially in the presence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors. Conventional chemotherapeutics and some of the newer anticancer signaling inhibitors carry a substantial risk of cardiovascular complications that include:[3]

  • Myocardial dysfunction and heart failure
  • Coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • Valvular disease
  • Arterial hypertension
  • Arrhythmia and QT prolongation
  • Peripheral vascular disease (PVD)
  • Thromboembolic disease
  • Pericardial disease.


While some of these side effects manifest early during cancer treatment and hence affect the ongoing cancer therapy, some side effects manifest years later. Some complications are irreversible and cause progressive CVD while others induce only transient dysfunction with no apparent long-term sequelae. The complications are more frequent when two or more chemotherapy agents are combined and/or radiotherapy (RT) is also included in the treatment protocol as these modalities have a complimentary or synergistic cardiotoxic effect. The challenge for the treating oncologist and cardiologist is to balance the need for life-saving cancer treatment with the assessment of risk from cancer drug-associated cardiovascular side effects to prevent long-term damage to the heart. Furthermore, sometimes, the full spectrum of cardiotoxicity frequently does not become apparent until months or even years after the cancer treatment; hence, long-term follow-up of patients exposed to potentially cardiotoxic cancer drug is needed.

[Table 1] summarizes common predisposing factors for cancer chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity, whereas [Table 2] summarizes the cardiovascular complications of commonly used chemotherapeutic agents.
Table 1: Predisposing risk factors for cardiotoxicity

Click here to view
Table 2: Cardiovascular complications of commonly used chemotherapy agents

Click here to view



  Cardiovascular Complications of Commonly Used Chemotherapy Agents Top


Myocardial dysfunction and heart failure

Cardiac dysfunction is the most serious complication of cancer treatment. Cardiotoxicity can manifest early after chemotherapy or as a late presentation. Conventional chemotherapies such as anthracyclines (doxorubicin, idarubicin, epirubicin), antimetabolites (clofarabine), and alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide) can cause permanent myocardial cell injury resulting in cell loss (apoptosis/necrosis) and hence an irreversible damage (Type I). This can later on lead to progressive remodeling resulting in late cardiomyopathy. Whereas novel agents such as immune-therapies and targeted therapies cause transient reversible dysfunction (Type II) due to disarray of contractile elements and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, preexisting heart disease and combination of therapies can lead to unpredictable long-term complications.

Anthracyclines and nonanthracycline analog mitoxantrone

These are very effective antineoplastic agents for solid tumors and hematological malignancies; however, their cardiotoxic effects are well established. The complications are mostly dose dependent and can depend on susceptibility of the patient. Incidences of heart failure were 3%, 7%, and 18% with a cumulative dose of 400, 500, and 700 mg/m 2.[4] The most accepted pathophysiological mechanism is generation of reactive oxygen species which eventually damages cardiomyocytes, and hence, the dysfunction is irreversible. Topoisomerase (Top 2b) was recently revealed as mediator of toxicity; inhibition of which causes double-stranded breaks in DNA which leads to myocyte death.[5] Acute side effects are generally reversible and self-limiting and can manifest as electrocardiography (ECG) changes, arrhythmias, or pericarditis. It is not certain if early dysfunction can be progressive or can evolve into late dysfunction. Elevation of biomarkers may identify the people at risk for progressive disease. Early changes can appear within 1st year of treatment and late dysfunction can appear after several years. Due to good cardiac reserve and compensatory mechanisms, clinical manifestation can appear late.

Risk factors for developing cardio-toxicity with anthracyclines

Age (pediatrics age >65 years), female sex, renal failure, preexisting heart disease/hypertension, cumulative dose, combined chemotherapy (with alkylating or microtubule agents and immune and targeted agents), previous RT to heart with genetic predisposition.

Cardioprotective strategies

Using drugs such as epirubicin with an altered anthracycline structure;using altered drug delivery, and schedule system (infusion instead of bolus); use of cardioprotective agents such as dexrazoxane; using cardio- protective medications

Cyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide-related toxicity appears at high doses (>140 mg/kg) within days and primarily in patients with older age, bolus dose, and combination with other therapies or postmediastinal radiation.

Cisplatin and taxanes

Cisplatin requires high intravenous fluid infusion to avoid toxicity and this volume overload can lead to heart failure. Taxanes (docetaxel) when combined with other agents have been shown to lead to heart failure.

Immunotherapies and targeted therapies

These novel, selective mechanism-based agents target at molecular pathways as in kinase inhibition by monoclonal antibodies or soluble decoy receptors. Kinases play a crucial role in cardiovascular homeostasis and myocardial regulation as well; hence, by virtue of this inhibition, these agents actually result in off-target effects on heart.[6] Trastuzumab inhibits a humanized monoclonal antibody and targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) which is overexpressed in a subgroup of breast cancer patients.[7] Earlier 27% of the patients who were treated with trastuzumab and conventional chemotherapy like cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin developed symptomatic or asymptomatic heart failure. Mechanism of toxicity is structural and functional changes in contractile protein and mitochondria. Administering trastzumab after anthracycline or other agents and regular cardiac monitoring has reduced incidence of heart failure and has improved outcome of HER2 positive breast cancer patients. Long-term follow-up in these patients is also reassuring. Trastusumab-associated cardiotoxicity appears early during treatment and is reversible with interruption of therapy and initiation of cardioprotective medicines.

Risk factors

Previous/concomitant anthracycline treatment or RT, age (65 years), previous left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, hypertension, and advanced age.

Prevention strategies

Reducing anthracycline burden and increasing time duration between anthracycline and trastuzumab.

Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway (bevacizumab, sunitinib)

These agents, when used with other conventional agents, can cause hypertension, vascular toxic effects, and reversible or irreversible LV dysfunction with heart failure. Risk factors for developing cardiotoxicity are preexisting heart failure, CAD, valvular heart disease, or ischemic cardiomyopathy.[8]

Radiotherapy

There seems to be a synergistic effect of cardiotoxicity if RT and cardiotoxic chemotherapy are administered together. Mediastinal fibrosis is common post-RT along with diastolic dysfunction and reduced exercise capacity. Systolic dysfunction can occur if anthracyclines are combined with RT and previous CAD or valvular heart disease exists.


  Diagnostic Tools for Cardiotoxicity Top


Screening and risk stratification can be done by proper history and clinical examination of the patient scheduled to receive chemotherapy. Following investigations are helpful in monitoring the effects of chemotherapy and for diagnosing ensuing cardiotoxicity.

Electrocardiogram

To be done before and during the chemotherapy to identify ST-T changes, arrhythmias, QT prolongation, and conduction disturbances. These changes can be transient and not very specific.

Echocardiography

For assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before, during, and after the treatment. LVEF assessment by two-dimensional Simpson's or by three-dimensional (3D) method is done. Diagnostic criteria for cardiotoxicity is decrease of LVEF >10% value below lower limit of normal. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) of LV indicates early detection of LV dysfunction; and a relative reduction of GLS >15% from baseline indicates cardiac dysfunction. Advantage of echocardiography is its wide availability, lack of radiation, and evaluation of other hemodynamic parameters such as diastolic function, pulmonary hypertension, and valvular disease and pericardial involvement. Stress echocardiography is indicated for patients with high pretest probability for CAD.

Nuclear cardiac imaging (multiple-gated acquisition)

Less than ten percent decrease in LVEF or a value < 50% suggests cardiotoxicity. The advantage is that it is reproducible. Radiation exposure and limited structural and hemodynamic parameters limit the use.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is useful for cardiac structure and function. It is used to confirm the cause of LV dysfunction in challenging cases. It is of use to evaluate cardiac masses, pericardial involvement myocardial fibrosis, and infiltrative conditions. It is much more accurate and reproducible.

Cardiac biomarkers

Elevated troponin I, high-sensitivity troponin I, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal pro BNP (NT-pro BNP) are suggestive of cardiac myocyte injury and denote a bad prognosis. High values may suggest benefit with cardioprotective medications.

High-sensitivity troponin with GLS provides the greatest sensitivity (93%) and negative predictive value (91%) to predict cardiotoxicity.[9]


  Management of Patients With Cardiotoxicity Top


Patients who develop asymptomatic or clinical LV dysfunction benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers. Starting early treatment and a combination therapy has proved to be more beneficial.

Coronary artery disease

The chemotherapeutic agents known to cause CAD are fluoropyrimidines, platinum compounds, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors with or without RT.

Fluoropyrimidines used in gastrointestinal cancers are known to cause myocardial ischemia in 18% of patients, whereas 6%–7% can have silent ischemia seen during stress test.[10] Chest pain with ECG changes can appear within days of drug administration and can persist even after drug cessation. The pathophysiological mechanism is endothelial injury or vasospasm.

Cisplatin can cause ischemia in 2% of patients by creating a procoagulant state and arterial thrombosis.

Immunotherapies and targeted agents can cause a procoagulant state, arterial thrombosis, and endothelial injury. Bevacizumab is reported to cause arterial thrombosis in 3.8% of patients [11] treated for metastatic diseases, especially in age >65 years with vascular disease.

Radiation, especially supradiaphragmal, can lead to accelerated atherosclerosis, plaque rupture and thrombosis. Incidence and onset of complication are dose dependent. Thoracic doses >30 Gy can cause valvular disease, left anterior descending artery gets exposed in left breast irradiation and left main, circumflex, and right coronary artery for Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ostial lesions are common.[12] Presentation can be as acute coronary syndrome or it can manifest even 15–20 years after irradiation. Other than ischemia, radiation can also cause pericardial disease, arrhythmias myocardial fibrosis, and valvular heart diseases.

Risk factors for developing CAD postradiation include younger age at exposure, overall dose (>30–35 Gy), division into fractions (>2 Gy), use of cytotoxic chemotherapy, irradiation technique (tele-RT is more toxic than brachytherapy), longer time since exposure.[13]

Diagnostic tools and management

The presence of traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis can accelerate the incidence and onset of CAD; hence, clinical evaluation is of paramount importance in patients planned for RT. Because of high incidence of silent ischemia stress test, abnormalities are very common in patients with a history of RT, especially in Hodgkin's lymphoma and left breast cancer. Screening for CAD is by serial ECGs, cardiac enzyme stress tests, and echocardiogram should be done in patients receiving the culprit agents. Cardiac radionuclide and angiography can be diagnostic. Evaluation for subclinical ischemia even after 20 years is necessary in patients with a history of irradiation. The incidence of heart disease can, however, be reduced by proper risk stratification depending on age and preexisting CAD, avoiding combination with anthracyclines, thoracic shielding, and dose adjustments of radiation.

The management of CAD is by nitroglycerine and calcium channel blockers.

Valvular heart disease

Radiation-induced valvular heart disease is a well-established slow and progressive complication. Mechanism of damage is by ionizing radiation or fibrosis of the cardiac muscle, which is adjacent to valve rings resulting in distortion and loss of function and due to calcification. These changes include mostly by the mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valve. The progression to fibrotic thickening and calcification of the valves occurs much later, with stenosis often appearing 20 years after RT. Mitral and aortic valve regurgitation and aortic stenosis are the most common defects.[12]

Chemotherapy agents do not affect valves directly, but valvular function is seen secondary to LV dysfunction or infective endocarditis.

Diagnostic tools

Baseline and serial echocardiography and 3D echo are recommended in patients treated with RT. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are useful to see the severity and involvement of ascending aorta postradiation.

Hypertension

Novel agents, VEGF (such as bevacizumab and sunitinib), are known to contribute or worsen preexisting hypertension.[14] The incidence depends on age, history of hypertension, type of cancer (renal cell), therapeutic schedule, and combination cancer therapies. The complication seems to be associated with reduced function of nitric oxide synthase, endothelial dysfunction, disruption of normal capillary function in normal tissue, oxidative stress, and glomerular injury. VEGF inhibition also causes renal thrombotic microangiopathy.[15] Acute complication can result into heart failure, proteinuria, or intracerebral hemorrhage.

Risk factor includes preexisting hypertension and advanced age.

Management

Treatment of chemotherapy-induced hypertension is aimed at reducing the risk of morbidity yet maintaining effective dosing of therapy for optimal cancer treatment. The goal of treatment in these patients is usually limited to assess the risk factors and to maintain a blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg. Ambulatory BP monitoring, renal functions, lipid profile, and renal sonography may be required. Information about drug interaction (with steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], and erythropoietin) and pain and stress management are necessary for achieving the goal. Specific guidelines are not yet available. ACE inhibitors, ARB, and calcium channel blockers are the first-line of treatment; beta-1 blockers such as nevibulol are important because of its action on nitric oxide signaling. Severe hypertension may require reduction of VEGF inhibitor dosing or, in some cases, interruption of treatment. Diuretics can lead to electrolyte imbalance and QT prolongation hence should not be used as first-line drugs. Close monitoring and evaluation of treatment with lifestyle management remain the main stay of treatment.

Arrhythmias

Common chemotherapy drugs causing arrhythmias are summarized in [Table 3].
Table 3: Arrhythmias caused by common cancer chemotherapy drugs

Click here to view


Rhythm disturbances associated with anti-cancer therapy are generally transient. They are thought to be due to metabolic changes and resolve after electrolyte imbalance is corrected. However, some complications due to chemotherapy on heart rhythm is proposed to be due to direct electrophysiological effect on cardiac structure and function including myocardial ischemia and heart failure which creates a pro-arrhythmogenic substrate.[16] Metabolic changes and electrolyte balance concomitant medications such as anti-psychotics and anti-emetics are contributory factors. The arrhythmias can vary from transient sinus tachycardia, bradycardia, or conduction defects to QT prolongation and life-threatening ventricular tachycardia.

QT prolongation is associated with many cancer drug and occurs most commonly in patients with comorbidities such as diarrhea, vomiting causing electrolyte imbalance, and medications such as anti-emetics and anti-psychotics which too prolong QT interval. QT prolongation can lead to life-threatening torsade de pontes and hence needs close monitoring. QTc prolongation >450 ms in males and >460 ms in females are taken as upper limit of normal. Prolongation >500 ms or a change from baseline >60 ms is considered risky and warrants temporarily interruption of cancer treatment. Arsenic trioxide used in certain leukemia and myeloma is the most common culprit which prolongs the QT in 26%–93% of patients resulting in serious ventricular tachycardias,[16] followed by anthracyclines and tyrosine kinase (TK) inibitors (vandetanib) which is used in thyroid cancer.

Risk factors for QT prolongation includes electrolyte imbalance (hypokalemia <3.5 mEq/L, hypomagnesemia <1.6 mg/dl, hypocalcemia, 8.5 mg/dl) caused by vomiting diarrhea or loop diuretics; hypothyroidism; concurrent use of other QT prolonging medicines such as (antiarrhtyhmics, antibiotics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiemetics). Other nonmodifiable factors can be baseline QT prolongation, family history of sudden death, advanced age, female sex, h/o CAD, impaired renal, or hepatic function.

Supraventricular tachycardias are common, with atrial fibrillation being the most common, which can occur during therapy or after treatment. It can occur due to direct tumor effects, LV dysfunction, comorbidities, electrolyte imbalance of postoperative lung resection.

Ventricular arrhythmias are secondary to QT prolongation, chemotherapy, or RT toxic effects in the presence of predisposing risk factors.

Conduction defects commonly seen after RT and are generally permanent. Paclitaxel and thalidomide are mostly implicated.

Management

Serial ECG to monitor QTc interval at baseline and every week thereafter and monthly during first 3 months depending on the drug schedule and risk factors. Echocardiography is done to assess LV systolic function, diastolic function, and valvular disease. Treatment aims at correcting electrolyte imbalance, removing other predisposing factors, and individualizing the antiarrhythmic drugs and device implantation (such as overdrive pacing or permanent pacemakers).

Treatment in atrial fibrillation includes rhythm management, anticoagulation, and stroke prevention using CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED score though it needs to be individualized depending on risk–benefit criteria. If CHA2DS2VASc score is >2 and platelet count is >50,000/mm 3, anticoagulation can be considered. Beta blocker or dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker can be used to control heart rate.

Pulmonary hypertension

This is a rare but dreaded complication of cancer chemotherapies and bone marrow transplantation. Dasatinib, a TK inhibitor used in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), can cause severe precapillary pulmonary hypertension. It can occur 8–40 months after exposure to this agent [17] and generally reversible after therapy is interrupted. Cyclophosphamide and other alkylating agents can also cause pulmonary hypertension.

Baseline assessment warrants risk factor assessment, assessment of New York Heart Association functional class, 6-min walk test, NT-pro BNP, echocardiography to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at least every 3–6 months.

Multidisciplinary team decision is necessary for risk–benefit ratio of continuing treatment with PAH versus stopping culprit drug.

Thromboembolic disease

Cancer patients are in hypercoaguable state due to procagulant, antifibrinolytic, and proaggregating actions of tumor cells. Certain chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin, bevaciizumab, sinitinib, sorafenib, and hormonal therapy such as tamoxifen can increase chances of venous and arterial thromboembolic events by direct endothelial effects or change in coagulation profile.

Arterial thrombosis is rare and occurs in 1% of patients with metastatic, breast, colorectal, and lung cancers with anthracyclins, taxanes, platinum-based drugs, and tamoxifen.

Venous thrombosis is, however, more frequent with high rate of morbidity and mortality and is sometimes the first manifestation of an occult cancer. It is common in hospitalized patients undergoing chemotherapy, especially through indwelling catheter.[18] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of death in postoperative patients of cancer.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism

Primary site of cancer (pancreas, brain, stomach); histology (adenocarcinoma); metastatic stage; patient related factors such as old age and female sex; comorbidities such as infection, renal disease, lung disease; history of VTE; major surgery, hospitalization, hormonal therapies, central catheters, concomitant chemotherapy agents.

Management

Prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended in only high-risk patients who are hospitalized and have to undergo major surgery. Acute VTE is treated by low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 3–6 months and thereafter long-term anticoagulation is necessary. Recurrent VTE justifies vena cava filter and dose adjustment of LMWH replacement with other anticoagulants.

Peripheral vascular disease

PVD is seen commonly in patients treated with nilotinib, ponatinib, or BCR-ABL TK inhibitors used in CML. Raynaud's phenomenon and ischemic stroke are also seen with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and methotrexate.

Risk of stroke is doubled after mediastinal, cervical, or cranial RT. Mechanism of small vessel injury is by endothelial damage and thrombus formation, whereas medium to large vessel involvement is due to vasa vasorum occlusion with medial necrosis, adventitial fibrosis, accelerated atherosclerosis leading to arterial stiffness and advanced atherosclerosis.

Baseline risk assessment with clinical examination, ankle-brachial index, and peripheral Doppler study is necessary. Antiplatelet therapy is indicated only in symptomatic PVD. Need for revascularization/stenting should be individualized.

Pericardial disease

Acute pericarditis is seen with anthracyclins, cylophosphamide, cytarabine, bleomycin, and RT and presents with chest pain, fever, ST-T changes, and large effusions. The pathology is due to accumulation of collagen fibers in mesothelium of epicardium, visceral pericardium, and interstitium [19] which increases the fibrous layer thickness. Echocardiography or CT scan is diagnostic treatment is with NSAIDs and colchicines. Pericardiocentesis and pericardial window may be required for large effusions.

Pericardial effusion is very common in cancer patients and is due to cancer itself, infections, heart failure, or fluid retention.

Autonomic dysfunction

RT can lead to cardiac sympathetic imbalance leading to rhythm disturbance, silent ischemia, and high pain threshold.


  Recommended Methods to Monitor Patients on Cancer Treatment to Monitor the Heart Top


Following are the recommended methods for monitoring patients on cancer treatment for potential cardiotoxicity:[13]

Chemotherapy

LV dysfunction: ECG, MRI, multiple-gated acquisition scan, sampling of serial troponin, and/or NT-pro BNP levels.

Radiotherapy

  • CAD: lipid profile, exercise stress test, radionuclide, angiography, echocardiogram, ECG
  • Pericarditis: ECG, chest X-ray, and echocardiogram
  • Cardiomyopathy: ECG, echocardiogram, and radioisotopic angiography
  • Valvular heart disease: echocardiogram, ECG, cardiac catheterization
  • Arrhythmias: ECG and 24-h ECG.



  Strategies to Reduce Chemotherapy-induced Cardiotoxicity Top


Early assessment of risk factors known to cause cardiotoxicity by detailed history and clinical evaluation can never be over emphasized. History of previous anthracycline, RT, h/o CAD, hypertension, arrhythmia, valvular disease, or presence of traditional risk factors should be considered before choosing the drug regimen, dose, and duration of therapy. Baseline ECG, LVEF assessment, biomarkers, and BNP monitoring are recommended. It is advisable to reassess LV function after four cycles of chemotherapy if LVEF has reduced by 15% points or 10% to a value below 50 and repeat assessment after 3 weeks confirms the drop in LVEF or if troponin I or BNP are elevated, interruption of chemotherapy should be considered. Keeping in mind, the late presentation of cardiac damage in anthracite-based regimen, it is pertinent to assess systolic function after 6 months of cessation of chemotherapy, annually for 2–3 years, and then at 3–5 years' interval for life[Table 4].[20]
Table 4: Strategies to reduce cancer chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity

Click here to view


Strict optimization of risk factors and initiation of cardioprotective drugs are recommended before chemotherapy. Beta blocker, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and dexrazoxane (for anthracycline) have showed beneficial effects.

Long-term follow-up is of utmost importance in cancer patients who have undergone RT or chemotherapy with drugs known to cause cardiotoxicity. It is known that LV dysfunction and heart failure can present even 10 years after cancer treatment; hence, it is important to create awareness of possible cardiac disease in cancer survivors to report early signs of cardiac disease and encourage regular follow-up with cardiac imaging and biomarkers evaluation.

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nandakumar A. National Cancer Registry Programme. Indian Council for Medical Research, Consolidated Report of the Population Based Cancer Registries 1990-96. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Munoz D, Aboyans V, Asteggiano, R, Galderisi M, et al. 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37:2768-2801.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lefrak EA, Pitha J, Rosenheim S, Gottlieb JA. A clinicopathologic analysis of adriamycin cardiotoxicity. Cancer 1973;32:302-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zhang S, Liu X, Bawa-Khalfe T, Lu LS, Lyu YL, Liu LF, et al. Identification of the molecular basis of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat Med 2012;18:1639-42.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med 2005;353:172-87.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001;344:783-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bair SM, Choueiri TK, Moslehi J. Cardiovascular complications associated with novel angiogenesis inhibitors: Emerging evidence and evolving perspectives. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2013;23:104-13.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sawaya H, Sebag IA, Plana JC, Januzzi JL, Ky B, Tan TC, et al. Assessment of echocardiography and biomarkers for the extended prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:596-603.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lestuzzi C, Vaccher E, Talamini R, Lleshi A, Meneguzzo N, Viel E, et al. Effort myocardial ischemia during chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil: An underestimated risk. Ann Oncol 2014;25:1059-64.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Scappaticci FA, Skillings JR, Holden SN, Gerber HP, Miller K, Kabbinavar F, et al. Arterial thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1232-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Cuomo JR, Sharma GK, Conger PD, Weintraub NL. Novel concepts in radiation-induced cardiovascular disease. World J Cardiol 2016;8:504-19.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mozdzanowska D, Wozniewski M. Radiotherapy and anthracyclines – Cardiovascular toxicity. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2015;19:93-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Colt JS, Schwartz K, Graubard BI, Davis F, Ruterbusch J, DiGaetano R, et al. Hypertension and risk of renal cell carcinoma among white and black Americans. Epidemiology 2011;22:797-804.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hayman SR, Leung N, Grande JP, Garovic VD. VEGF inhibition, hypertension, and renal toxicity. Curr Oncol Rep 2012;14:285-94.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tamargo J, Caballero R, Delpón E. Cancer chemotherapy and cardiac arrhythmias: A review. Drug Saf 2015;38:129-52.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Montani D, Bergot E, Günther S, Savale L, Bergeron A, Bourdin A, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients treated by dasatinib. Circulation 2012;125:2128-37.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Mehran Karimi and Nader Cohan. Cancer-associated thrombosis. Open Cardiovasc Med J 2010;4:78-82.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Darby SC, Cutter DJ, Boerma M, Constine LS, Fajardo LF, Kodama K, et al. Radiation-related heart disease: Current knowledge and future prospects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:656-65.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Suter TM, Ewer MS. Cancer drugs and the heart: Importance and management. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1102-11.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Cardiovascular C...
Diagnostic Tools...
Management of Pa...
Recommended Meth...
Strategies to Re...
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2470    
    Printed104    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded267    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]