• Users Online: 746
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
LANDMARK TRIALS
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 142-152

The challenge of optimal evaluation of low and intermediate pretest probability stable chest pain: Insights from recent randomized clinical trials


1 Department of Cardiology, Medanta - Mediclinic, New Delhi, India
2 Division of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology, Medanta Heart Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Satyanarayana Upadhyayula
Consultant Cardiology, Medanta - Mediclinic, E-18 Defence Colony, New Delhi - 110 024
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCPC.JCPC_25_19

Rights and Permissions

Given the wide knowledge gaps in the evaluation of patients with low and intermediate pretest probability stable chest pain and the ubiquity of noninvasive imaging the below mentioned largest, most comprehensive and timely randomized clinical trials (RCTs), provide valuable insights into risk stratification, diagnosis, management, prognostication, and outcomes. Rapid clinical assessment of patients with low/intermediate-risk stable chest pain can identify high-risk individuals. However, about 33% of patients labeled as noncardiac chest pain die from cardiovascular disease or develop acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during 5 years' follow-up. About 1.5% of patients with ACS are missed even after extensive testing leading to potential medical, legal, and psychological sequelae. As a result, clinicians have a low threshold to admit even low risk patients for prolonged expensive observation and testing leading to unnecessary admissions, false-positive test results, and unnecessary invasive downstream investigations. This scenario gives a clarion call for improving the diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and prognostication in low/intermediate-risk stable chest pain patients. The most common clinical scenario most of us come across is a middle-aged patient with new onset/recurrent low/intermediate-risk stable chest pain attending the emergency department (ED). Issues which are head scratching and mindboggling about this scenario is the ability of the clinician to optimally utilize the appropriate tests from the available armamentarium of functional, anatomical and biochemical diagnostic strategies (exercise electrocardiogram, stress echocardiogram, nuclear stress test, computed tomographic coronary angiography, and circulating biomarkers) to arrive at accurate diagnosis for flawless management. One of the main purposes of the article is to avoid underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis in patients with stable chest pain. We have cherry-picked four large recent landmark RCTs to help the clinician to sharpen his clinical skills, maximize diagnostic accuracy, speed up emergent interventions, assist in surgical planning, and optimize medical therapies. Unfortunately, physical examination for determining the cause of low/intermediate-risk stable chest pain is neither sensitive nor specific to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The four recent RCTs are as follows: (1) PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain trial; (2) Scottish COmputed Tomography of the History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and initial Troponin Trial; (3) Impact on Management of the HEART Risk Score in Chest Pain Patients trial; and (4) Randomized Investigation of Chest Pain Diagnostic Strategies, Shared Decision-Making in the ED: Chest Pain Choice trial.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed60    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded10    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal